南非法院批评前法官不适当地处理一个简单的驱逐案。 South African court criticizes former judge for improperly handling a simple eviction case.

南非最高上诉法院批评前西开普法官John Hlophe总统不当干涉一个简单的驱逐案件。 The Supreme Court of Appeal in South Africa criticized former Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe for improperly interfering in a simple eviction case. Hlophe亲自挑选了两名法官并发布了详细的指令,导致一项错误的判决未能承认基本的法律原则。 Hlophe handpicked two judges and issued detailed directives, resulting in a flawed judgment that failed to recognize basic legal principles. 该案涉及从开普敦的一个财产中驱逐非法占用者,导致财产所有者产生大笔账单。 The case involved the eviction of unlawful occupants from a property in Cape Town, leading to the property owners incurring large bills. 法院还指出,为一个直截了当的案件任命两名法官给法院的日程安排增加了不必要的压力。 The court also noted that appointing two judges for a straightforward case added unnecessary strain to the court's schedule.