美国陆军退役中校阿莫斯·福克斯（Amos Fox）对精确制导弹药（PGM）可以减少附带损害和缩短战争持续时间的假设提出质疑，并引用“精确悖论”作为证据。 Retired US Army Lt. Col. Amos Fox disputes the assumption that precision-guided munitions (PGMs) reduce collateral damage and war duration, citing the "precision paradox" as evidence.

美国退役陆军中校阿莫斯·福克斯 (Amos Fox) 揭穿了精确制导弹药 (PGM) 或“智能炸弹”能够限制附带损害的神话，并声称它们甚至可能使结果更加恶化。 Retired US Army Lt. Col. Amos Fox debunks the myth that precision-guided munitions (PGMs), or "smart bombs," limit collateral damage, asserting they may even worsen outcomes. “精确度悖论”是指精确制导弹药出现故障，需要进行更多次打击或地面行动，从而可能增加平民伤亡。 The "precision paradox" occurs when PGMs fail, requiring more strikes or ground operations, potentially increasing civilian casualties. 福克斯认为，减少冲突地区损失的重点应该放在战略上，而不是武器的精确度上。 Fox argues the focus should be on strategy, not the weapon's precision, in reducing conflict zone damage.