最高法院在请愿人缺乏法律背景,承认使用大赦国际起草后,驳回了针对Prime CARES基金的一项PIL诉讼。 The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL against PM CARES Fund after the petitioner, lacking legal background, admitted using AI to draft it.

据悉, 拉吉纳州的布料商拉吉纳斯·西杜 (Rajneesh Sidhu) 曾经使用人工智能来起草这份复杂的请愿书, 但他没有法律经验, 于是最高法院驳回了对PM CARES基金的公益诉讼. The Supreme Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the PM CARES Fund filed by Rajnish Sidhu, a Ludhiana cloth trader with only a Class 12 education and no legal experience, after he admitted using AI to draft the complex petition. 首席法官Surya Kant质疑档案的真实性,指出先进的法律语言与Sidhu的背景相矛盾,并批评在司法呈件中使用AI。 Chief Justice Surya Kant questioned the authenticity of the filing, noting the advanced legal language contradicted Sidhu’s background, and criticized the use of AI in judicial submissions. 当Sidhu无法解释关键的法律术语时,法院认为该请愿书是轻率的,并予以驳回,警告不要为宣传或个人动机滥用PILs。 When Sidhu could not explain key legal terms, the court deemed the petition frivolous and dismissed it, warning against misuse of PILs for publicity or personal motives.